Major frauds ruin careers and prompt lawsuits, yet rarely force core theories to be rolled back when the field’s claims are supported by many independent studies. This asymmetry implies scandal intensity and scientific impact often diverge.
— It urges media, funders, and universities to separate reputational crises from the strength of underlying knowledge when judging a field’s health.
Paul Bloom
2025.08.19
100% relevant
Bloom cites the Stapel report’s 'Impact of the fraud' section cataloging reputational harms and argues there were essentially no theory‑level changes.
← Back to All Ideas