Courts policing zero‑price platforms prioritize price metrics and sideline safety/privacy harms, as Judge Boasberg deemed Instagram grooming evidence 'ancillary' in FTC v. Meta. This doctrinal blindspot constrains competition enforcement against platform degradation.
— Determines whether antitrust can address dominant platforms’ non‑price harms (youth safety, privacy, quality) or if new statutes/regulatory regimes are needed, reshaping Big Tech governance and legislative strategy.
Matt Stoller
2025.08.20
100% relevant
The article details Boasberg’s dismissal of internal Meta exhibits showing algorithmic recommendations of minors to suspected groomers as irrelevant to the FTC’s monopoly case.
← Back to All Ideas