FTC–Meta: Safety-Blind Antitrust

Updated: 2025.08.20 6M ago 1 sources
Courts policing zero‑price platforms prioritize price metrics and sideline safety/privacy harms, as Judge Boasberg deemed Instagram grooming evidence 'ancillary' in FTC v. Meta. This doctrinal blindspot constrains competition enforcement against platform degradation. — Determines whether antitrust can address dominant platforms’ non‑price harms (youth safety, privacy, quality) or if new statutes/regulatory regimes are needed, reshaping Big Tech governance and legislative strategy.

Sources

Tyrants of the Algorithm: Big Tech’s Corrosive Rule and Its Consequences
Matt Stoller 2025.08.20 100% relevant
The article details Boasberg’s dismissal of internal Meta exhibits showing algorithmic recommendations of minors to suspected groomers as irrelevant to the FTC’s monopoly case.
← Back to All Ideas