Large GWAS show genetic variants correlate with which academic field people choose (technical vs social; practical vs abstract), even after controlling for years of schooling. If robust, these signals could influence debates about admissions, career guidance, and how societies interpret aptitude versus opportunity.
— This connects genetics to labor‑market sorting and education policy—if genetic correlates of field choice are meaningful, policymakers must confront implications for fairness, selection, and targeted support.
Aporia
2026.01.10
100% relevant
Rosa Cheesman et al.’s multi‑country GWAS (Finland, Norway, Netherlands) identifying 17 independent loci and two major genetic dimensions of field choice is the concrete study underlying this idea.
← Back to All Ideas