Regulators routinely use administrative settlements—agreements that impose compliance regimes, reporting duties, and behavioral restrictions—as a channel of policy-making separate from rulemaking or adjudication. Those settlements steer industry norms, create de facto regulation, and coerce firms to accept constraints because agencies can retaliate through other discretionary tools.
— Recognizing settlements as a form of governance reframes debates about administrative power, accountability, and corporate incentives and suggests new levers for reform (court rules, disclosure, legislative limits).
John O. McGinnis
2026.04.09
100% relevant
Lloyd Blankfein’s recounting of settling an SEC suit for $550 million despite believing it meritless, and the essay’s references to Loper Bright, SEC v. Jarkesy, and Axon, illustrate how settlements operate as leverage over regulated firms.
← Back to All Ideas