Grants as Immigration Coercion

Executive agencies can coerce state and local compliance on contested policy (here immigration enforcement) by conditioning essential homeland‑security grants or by making access to awarded funds administratively difficult. Oregon’s blocked acceptance of ~$18 million after a judge forbade strings, plus DHS disabling the portal and pressuring states to sign future cooperation declarations, shows how the mechanism works in practice and sparks litigation over federal overreach. — If federal grant architecture becomes a routine lever for enforcing political priorities, it will remake federal–state relations, politicize emergency and counterterrorism programs, and raise urgent questions about judicial remedies, appropriation control, and democratic accountability.