Hereditarian elite persuasion campaign

Updated: 2025.08.15 6M ago 7 sources
A strategic push to normalize group-mean genetic explanations among elites to undercut equality-of-outcome frameworks. — If mainstreamed, this reframes civil-rights enforcement, DEI policy, education curricula, and public narratives on merit and discrimination, intensifying ethical and governance conflicts.

Sources

Exploring Genetic Traits Around the World with Polygenic Scores
Davide Piffer 2025.08.15 75% relevant
By packaging cross-population educational-attainment PGS (and planned IQ) in a polished, paywalled 'research' dashboard with interpretive labels ('High compared to average'), the article advances the normalization of group-mean genetic explanations for cognitive outcomes—an informational asset that can be used to persuade elites and influence discourse about inequality and DEI.
How Embryo Selection Technology exposes the Transferability Paradox
Davide Piffer 2025.08.01 75% relevant
The author explicitly urges acknowledgment of ancestry-based differences, using embryo selection and GWAS transferability as evidence; this aligns with efforts to normalize group-mean genetic explanations to reshape policy norms around equality, education, and health equity.
A new Nature study rewrites the history of Papua New Guinea: relevance for Holocene-selection on intelligence
Davide Piffer 2025.07.28 75% relevant
By anchoring claims about lower average IQ and a 'social complexity + farming' selection model to a high-profile Nature study, the author attempts to normalize group-mean genetic explanations for cognitive differences among educated readers, fitting the pattern of using scientific signage to advance hereditarian arguments.
Would Eugenics Work? Simulating Positive Eugenics Targeting IQ
Uncorrelated 2025.07.17 85% relevant
The article uses quantitative genetics and macroeconomic projections to argue that subsidizing higher-IQ parents ($20k per SD above the mean) would raise national IQ and dramatically boost GDP/innovation, normalizing heredity-based policy framing and providing a technocratic rationale that could be used to persuade elites to accept genetic explanations in policy design.
A Return to Nurture
Steve Sailer 2025.06.18 78% relevant
The article promotes IQ psychometrics as causally central, revisits contested group IQ gaps, and urges elites/progressives to accept these claims—aligning with efforts to normalize hereditarian explanations that would reframe equality and policy debates.
The Imago DEI
John Carter 2025.05.28 85% relevant
The piece argues that human (and group) ability variance makes 'equality of opportunity' incoherent and calls for embracing inequality, aligning with efforts to normalize hereditarian explanations to undercut equality-of-outcome frameworks among elites.
A Guide for the Hereditarian Revolution
Nathan Cofnas 2024.02.05 100% relevant
The article calls for elites to adopt 'race realism' as the necessary precondition for defeating 'wokism,' prioritizing ideological conversion over legal or procedural fixes.
← Back to All Ideas