High spending doesn’t guarantee better schools

Updated: 2026.09.26 20D ago 2 sources
State-by-state NAEP data show some low‑spending states (e.g., Mississippi, Louisiana) ranking at or near the top after demographic adjustment, while very high‑spending systems like New York are only modestly above average. That suggests the policy problem is not only 'raise more money' but 'get better value from existing spending' and consider local tax‑politics constraints on funding increases. — Shifts the debate from ‘more money’ to ‘how money is used’ and whether progressive tax proposals that assume mobile elites can be applied at state and local scales.

Sources

Flattering Mirrors, AI Therapists, and the Cost of Discriminating Against White Men
Steve Stewart-Williams 2026.09.26 82% relevant
The newsletter cites Abdulkadiroğlu et al. (2014) and notes narrow–admit studies where gaining entry to elite schools does not boost outcomes — this directly echoes the existing idea that elite school outcomes reflect selection more than schooling, with implications for school‑choice and funding debates.
Is a new teacher better off in Mississippi than in New York?
Matthew Yglesias 2026.03.05 100% relevant
The article cites Urban Institute demographically adjusted NAEP scores where Mississippi ranks first in eighth‑grade math and high spending New York is not top, and notes marginal, targeted investments (HVAC) can help even where aggregate spending is high.
← Back to all ideas