Based on parental‑investment logic and comparative evidence, humans evolved toward mutual mate choice: both men and women are choosy about long‑term partners and both compete for high‑quality mates, making human sexual selection more like pair‑bonding birds than most mammals. This reframes typical evolutionary stories that emphasize male competition and female choice as the default human model.
— Reframing humans as mutual choosers changes how we talk about gender roles, parenting policy, and claims that biology deterministically prescribes social arrangements.
Steve Stewart-Williams
2026.04.04
100% relevant
Steve Stewart‑Williams and Andrew Thomas’s Psychological Inquiry paper (2013) and the forthcoming book excerpt explicitly advance the mutual‑mate‑choice model as an alternative to the traditional males‑compete/females‑choose narrative.
← Back to All Ideas