Humans Fail The LLM Test

A satirical debate has 'Iblis' apply standard large‑language‑model critiques to people: short working memory, reliance on scratchpads, shallow pattern‑matching, and transfer failures. The gag shows many 'hallucination' and 'world‑model' complaints fit humans too, suggesting evaluation artifacts and scaffolding design drive a lot of perceived 'understanding' gaps. — Reframing AI deficits as human‑typical failure modes encourages more honest benchmarks and methods (e.g., scratchpads, prompts) before drawing sweeping policy conclusions about AI competence or danger.