Incrementalism Traps Europe’s AI Catch‑Up

Updated: 2026.10.06 3H ago 1 sources
Europe’s firms and policies optimize for incremental improvements inside incumbent sectors instead of enabling creative destruction; rigid labor laws, hard bankruptcy procedures, and a fragmented market make starting, failing, and scaling new tech businesses unusually costly. That combination leaves Europe vulnerable to being outcompeted in platform and AI industries even where it has strong legacy manufacturing. — If true, the diagnosis implies targeted institutional reforms (bankruptcy, labor flexibility, single‑market deepening, scale‑friendly funding) are necessary levers for Europe to regain technological competitiveness and strategic autonomy.

Sources

Luis Garicano on Why Europe Fell Behind
Yascha Mounk 2026.10.06 100% relevant
Luis Garicano (London School of Economics; cofounder of The Rhine Group) argues Europe’s strength in incremental innovation and its difficulty in creating/destroying firms—due to firing/hiring rules, bankruptcy difficulty, and scaling barriers—explains the continent missing the IT revolution and likely the AI revolution.
← Back to all ideas