Judicial Temperament as Institutional Stabilizer

Updated: 2026.01.15 14D ago 1 sources
A judge’s public reserve, avoidance of spectacle, and focus on procedural modesty function as an institutional stabilizer: by not seeking the spotlight, a jurist preserves court legitimacy, reduces perception of partisanship, and makes the institution less vulnerable to politicized attacks. — If judges and other officials adopt and signal this temperament, it reduces political polarization around courts, improves public trust in adjudication, and constrains cycles of retributive lawfare.

Sources

The Judicial Temperament
Andy Smarick 2026.01.15 100% relevant
Andy Smarick’s review of Amy Coney Barrett’s Listening to the Law emphasizes Barrett’s consistent restraint—minimal personal anecdotes, avoidance of theatricality, judicial‑style prose—as evidence that temperament itself is a policy‑relevant institutional tool.
← Back to All Ideas