Expanding and sustaining American global primacy requires discretionary centralized decision‑making and institutional capabilities that can undermine democratic accountability at home. That tension means arguments for 'liberal' empire must reckon with incentive, information, and hypocrisy problems rather than rest on aspirational claims about moral superiority.
— Makes explicit the democratic cost side of pro‑hegemony arguments and reframes debates about American power around institutional trade‑offs and governance limits, not just ends.
Christopher Coyne
2026.05.11
100% relevant
Christopher Coyne’s review of Shadi Hamid’s The Case for American Power: Coyne argues American hegemony 'requires a kind of discretion and centralized decision‑making at odds with true democratic values.'
← Back to all ideas