Many younger citizens lack the visceral memory of 9/11 that justified extraordinary policy choices at the time, yet those choices (open‑ended counterterrorism, expanded executive power, and a rhetoric of liberal universalism) remain embedded in institutions and elite narratives. That disjunction — between lived memory and institutional continuity — helps explain contemporary generational divides over foreign policy, civil liberties, and the credibility of liberal internationalism.
— Spotlighting the intergenerational memory gap reframes debates about legitimacy and reform of post‑9/11 institutions and foreign‑policy commitments.
Jerusalem Demsas
2026.09.10
100% relevant
Author notes personal lack of memory of 9/11 and cites polls (e.g., Oct. 2001 Gallup/CBS results) showing public support for an expansive war, illustrating how a felt trauma shaped durable policy despite fading personal memory among younger cohorts.
← Back to all ideas