EditorDavid
2026.10.03
90% relevant
The judge’s opinion explicitly treats fleet ALPR data as an indiscriminate, continuous catalogue of whereabouts and orders suppression of evidence obtained after an ALPR search; that underscores the practical auditing, oversight, and evidentiary problems the existing 'license‑plate reader audit gap' idea flags — namely, law enforcement uses of ALPR systems without robust legal or procedural checks.