Cities are seeing delivery bots deployed on sidewalks without public consent, while their AI and safety are unvetted and their sensors collect ambient audio/video. Treat these devices as licensed operators in public space: require permits, third‑party safety certification, data‑use rules, insurance, speed/geofence limits, and complaint hotlines.
— This frames AI robots as regulated users of shared infrastructure, preventing de facto privatization of sidewalks and setting a model for governing everyday AI in cities.
Tiare Gatti Mora
2025.12.03
46% relevant
The database idea argues devices in public space should be licensed, permitted, and governed; the article’s concrete discussion of court‑ordered tracking bracelets, telecom dashboards, and private contractor failures maps onto the same governance problem: what rules, permits, oversight and vendor accountability apply when the state relies on pervasive monitoring devices.
Devin Reese
2025.12.01
68% relevant
Both pieces are about introducing autonomous devices into shared biological or social spaces and the need for permit/permit‑style governance and safety protocols; the elephant study highlights practical consequences (habituation, disturbance thresholds) that strengthen the case for treating drone deployments in conservation areas as licensed, safety‑certified activities rather than ad‑hoc experiments.
Yael Bar Tur
2025.12.01
85% relevant
Both the article and the existing idea treat new mobile devices in public space as de facto operators of shared infrastructure that require permitting, safety certification, geofencing and operational rules; Central Park’s proposed multi‑lane reimagining parallels the call to license and regulate entrants (here e‑bikes, pedicabs, delivery vehicles) rather than leave enforcement ad hoc.
EditorDavid
2025.10.04
100% relevant
Serve Robotics’ Atlanta launch, Uber Eats collaboration, and experts noting 'completely unregulated' AI and unknown safety standards