The nineteenth‑century choice to represent time as a single forward‑moving line functioned like a political‑technical device: it made narratives of progress, historical causation and planning legible and actionable. That graphic and conceptual habit reshaped how states, historians and citizens justified reform, economic planning and notions of historical responsibility.
— If accepted, this reframes many modern policy arguments (progress, development, reparations, forecasting) as downstream effects of a change in temporal representation rather than purely substantive disagreements.
Emily Thomas
2026.01.16
100% relevant
Emily Thomas details the 19th‑century chronography shift and Adams’s 1881 universal timeline as concrete exemplars of how the line‑image of time became a cultural and institutional tool.
← Back to All Ideas