When a news organization publishes reporting that materially shapes national politics (investigations cited by leaders, triggering prosecutions, or awarding prizes), an independent, transparent postmortem should be required: publish a timeline of editorial decisions, source provenance, internal review memos, and a public assessment of what went right and wrong. These audits would be time‑bound, include named participants, and be archived for future oversight and research.
— Institutionalizing public postmortems would raise journalistic standards, supply evidence for policy and legal debates about press influence, and reduce repeat mistakes that have outsized political consequences.
2023.01.30
100% relevant
Columbia Journalism Review’s longform project (Jeff Gerth’s interviews and archival reconstruction) functions as an ad hoc version of such a postmortem after Russiagate; CJR’s work shows the value and public appetite for exhaustive audits.
← Back to All Ideas