Mandatory Postmortems for Major Reporting

Updated: 2023.01.30 3Y ago 1 sources
When a news organization publishes reporting that materially shapes national politics (investigations cited by leaders, triggering prosecutions, or awarding prizes), an independent, transparent postmortem should be required: publish a timeline of editorial decisions, source provenance, internal review memos, and a public assessment of what went right and wrong. These audits would be time‑bound, include named participants, and be archived for future oversight and research. — Institutionalizing public postmortems would raise journalistic standards, supply evidence for policy and legal debates about press influence, and reduce repeat mistakes that have outsized political consequences.

Sources

Looking back on the coverage of Trump - Columbia Journalism Review
2023.01.30 100% relevant
Columbia Journalism Review’s longform project (Jeff Gerth’s interviews and archival reconstruction) functions as an ad hoc version of such a postmortem after Russiagate; CJR’s work shows the value and public appetite for exhaustive audits.
← Back to All Ideas