The popular concept of 'masking'—especially used to explain why many teenage girls receive late autism diagnoses—functions as a catch‑all that risks stretching the autism label to include ordinary anxiety, social coping, or gendered socialization. If accepted without clear biomarkers or operational criteria, masking turns a clinical diagnostic category into a culturally mediated identity, complicating treatment priorities and service eligibility.
— This matters because it reshapes who gets clinical help, educational accommodations, and social recognition, and feeds broader debates about medicalization, gender, and resource allocation.
Kathleen Stock
2026.03.06
100% relevant
Uta Frith telling TES that 'the spectrum has collapsed' and that 'masking has no scientific basis', plus the article's focus on a surge of teenage/female diagnoses.
← Back to All Ideas