Meta‑theoretic disproof of LLM consciousness

A class of mathematical/meta‑theoretic arguments can be used to rule out broad families of falsifiable theories that would ascribe subjective experience to large language models, producing a proof‑style result that LLMs have no 'what‑it‑is‑like' experience and therefore cannot be conscious in any morally relevant sense. — If accepted, such a proof would shift law, regulation, and ethics away from debates about granting AI personhood, criminal culpability, or rights, and toward conventional product‑safety, consumer‑protection and transparency rules for generative systems.