Empirical evidence shows that typical social‑media users encounter relatively little false or inflammatory content; instead, harmful exposure is concentrated among a small, highly motivated fringe. Policy and platform responses should therefore focus on the distributional extremes—the 'tails'—not broad censorship or average‑use interventions.
— Reorienting policy from average exposure to tail harms changes what regulators, platforms and researchers prioritize—transparency, targeted mitigation, and cross‑border research—while reducing overbroad censorship arguments.
2024.06.05
100% relevant
Nature Perspective (Budak et al., 2024) reviews behavioral studies showing low average exposure and recommends platform accountability and transparency focused on high‑consumption tails.
← Back to All Ideas