A recent meta‑analysis is reviving debate over whether men are, on average, cognitively superior to women; the article situates that study against a century of psychometrics, test‑construction choices, and cultural reactions. It highlights how modest effect sizes, test design, and item selection shape both results and public interpretation.
— If the meta‑analysis is robust, it will reframe policy discussions about education, employment, and affirmative‑action by reintroducing contested empirical claims about average sex differences.
Steve Sailer
2026.03.12
100% relevant
The author’s piece cites a newly published meta‑analysis and critiques historical test practices (Terman, Spearman) as the concrete hook for this renewed debate.
← Back to All Ideas