Non‑arXiv Preprints Spread Junk

Updated: 2026.03.08 3H ago 1 sources
A single technical rebuttal shows how papers posted on lesser‑vetted preprint platforms can make sensational but flawed claims (here: a supposed RSA‑breaking 'JVG algorithm') that are then amplified by link‑farming news sites. The problem is not just bad math: the publication venue and attention economy let errors escape expert scrutiny and reach the public. — If low‑quality preprint venues plus clickbait amplification become common, public debate and policymaking about technologies like quantum cryptography and AI risk will be misled by false alarms.

Sources

The ”JVG algorithm” is crap
Scott 2026.03.08 100% relevant
Scott Aaronson's March 7, 2026 Shtetl‑Optimized post debunks the 'JVG algorithm' (paper on Preprints.org) and notes its amplification on clickbait sites despite being ignored by reputable science outlets.
← Back to All Ideas