The piece claims Britons with Norman‑origin surnames (e.g., Glanville) are more likely to be wealthy than those with Anglo‑Saxon names (e.g., Smith, Cooper), a millennium after 1066. It ties this to how Norman elites recast 'English' as 'British' to justify rule, suggesting that identity and class stratification from conquest still echo in today’s politics.
— If conquest‑era lineage still predicts wealth, debates on inequality, nationalism, and elite legitimacy must reckon with deep ancestral persistence rather than only recent policy or markets.
Mary Harrington
2025.09.01
100% relevant
The article explicitly contrasts Norman vs Saxon surnames’ wealth likelihood and cites figures like the Duke of Westminster as emblematic of Norman‑lineage elite wealth.
← Back to All Ideas