Obviousness Paradox in Academia

Academics sometimes endorse theses that contradict common, easily observable facts (e.g., denying animal or infant consciousness) — a pattern I call the ‘obviousness paradox.’ The paradox highlights how disciplinary frames, methodological fashions, and institutional incentives can make counterintuitive claims seem intellectually respectable even when they conflict with everyday observation. — If widespread, the paradox helps explain rising public skepticism of expertise and suggests reforms in academic incentives and public-facing explanation are necessary to restore trust.