Instead of relying on household surveys that can undercount hidden populations, use operational inflow/outflow data—border apprehensions, visa overstays, deportations, mortality and emigration—to model the stock of undocumented residents. Applying this method yields a much higher estimate (about 22 million vs. ~11 million) for 1990–2016, even under conservative assumptions.
— If survey methods systematically undercount the undocumented, immigration policy and resource planning are being made on a mismeasured baseline.
Christopher F. Rufo
2026.01.15
85% relevant
Bessent’s emphasis—'follow the money' and using Minnesota as a model to push investigations to other states—parallels the existing idea that operational flows (remittances, benefit payments, banking/transaction logs) reveal much more about undocumented‑linked activity than headline surveys; the interview frames Treasury action centered on that operational evidence approach.
2026.01.12
86% relevant
Both the article and the existing idea focus on how measurement choices change conclusions about immigration. Lilley & VerBruggen argue that simple incarceration‑rate comparisons (a crude, biased operational measure) mask exposure/time‑at‑risk differences — the same class of objection the existing idea raises about using survey versus operational inflow/outflow data when estimating undocumented populations; the connection is that changing to an exposure‑adjusted operational denominator alters the policy narrative.
msmash
2026.01.09
72% relevant
The NBER study echoes the methodological thrust of this idea: instead of relying on demographic proxies (identity) to infer preferences, the authors collect direct data on school‑board policy priorities and use a regression‑discontinuity design to estimate causal effects—showing that observing actual policy views matters more than crude identity proxies.
Matthew Lilley, Robert VerBruggen
2026.01.09
90% relevant
Both pieces focus on how commonly used public data sources and summary statistics (ACS counts, incarceration stocks) can mislead policymaking about migration and its effects; the article argues for correcting the ACS-based incarceration comparison and points to better, more operationally grounded ways to measure immigrant interactions with the criminal‑justice system, connecting directly to the existing idea’s call to prefer operational inflow/outflow and administrative records over headline survey counts.
Tyler Cowen
2026.01.07
62% relevant
The article’s argument rests on operational border and asylum datasets (Frontex, Eurostat) rather than public polling or household surveys, matching the existing idea that administrative flows and encounter data are the right basis for measuring migration phenomena and guiding policy.
Steve Sailer
2025.12.31
62% relevant
The essay leans on the claim that public opinion and reality are misaligned with elite narratives about immigration scale; that maps to the methodological point that administrative inflow/outflow data give very different estimates of undocumented populations than household surveys—data that would be central to implementing or contesting a 'citizenist' policy.
Christopher F. Rufo
2025.12.03
52% relevant
Rufo cites hard totals (e.g., '53 million foreign‑born') and historical baselines; that emphasis on counting and the difficulty of measuring the undocumented population connects to the existing point that operational flows and administrative data often yield very different estimates than household surveys.
Freddie Sayers
2025.12.03
72% relevant
Both pieces focus on measurement methodology shaping migration claims: the article highlights how the ONS’s new method for counting emigrants (scanning for people who 'go dark') injects uncertainty, echoing the existing idea that operational data and method choices materially change migration estimates and policy conclusions.
2018.09.21
100% relevant
MIT–Yale study (PLOS ONE, 2018) combining apprehensions, overstay data, deportations, and demographics to estimate 22.1M undocumented immigrants.