Opposing Regime‑Change Wars Under Trump

This is a specific rationale for opposing foreign interventions that combines two claims: distrust of the incumbent president’s motives and methods (here, Trump’s second administration) plus skepticism about Washington’s bipartisan think‑tank assumptions that regime change yields stable, pro‑Western outcomes. It argues that even hawkish readers should judge interventions differently when they are pursued by actors with incentives to fight performative, high‑risk wars. — If adopted, it reframes how partisans evaluate military options—making the identity and incentives of the intervening government a central criterion for support or opposition.