By defining 'AI' and 'mental health' broadly, Nevada’s law risks ensnaring established machine-learning tools used to detect stress, dementia, intoxication, epilepsy, or intellectual disability. This could make marketing and adoption of useful diagnostic aids harder in schools and clinics.
— It shows how sloppy statutory drafting can impose unintended barriers on medical innovation and evidence-based tools.
msmash
2025.09.11
48% relevant
Like U.S. state laws that inadvertently block useful AI health tools, Apple’s EU blackout of live translation suggests broad or uncertain AI compliance regimes can deter deployment of benign consumer features. Here, the actors are Apple and EU regulators (AI Act/GDPR), with the outcome being region-specific feature withdrawal.
Tyler Cowen
2025.08.23
100% relevant
Dean Ball notes Nevada’s expansive AI definition and mental-health scope that could complicate marketing older ML systems.
← Back to All Ideas