Reuel Marc Gerecht
2025.10.13
86% relevant
The article argues Trump’s 'international stabilisation force' for Gaza is a 'worthy recommendation best staffed by others' and, if deployed, would face bleeding harassment and function like a 'typical UN peacekeeping mission: basically useless.' It details why likely contributors (U.S., Gulf states, Egypt, Jordan, EU, PA) won’t patrol while Hamas remains—directly echoing the idea that there are no credible senders for such a force.
David Patrikarakos
2025.10.05
100% relevant
The article notes Egypt’s historical scars, Jordan’s domestic risks, and European reluctance—leaving the proposed 'international stabilisation force' without realistic contributors.