Policy Markedness and Intergenerational Politics

People often experience the same tax or regulatory rule as either neutral policy or an act of intergenerational robbery depending on which cohort benefits; that perception gap (policy 'markedness') explains why debates about housing, pensions and taxes quickly become moralized. Making 'markedness' an explicit analytic category helps separate arguments about who actually benefits from arguments about symbolic fairness and identity. — If policymakers and commentators explicitly account for whether a policy is perceived as 'marked' (a targeted intergenerational transfer) versus 'unmarked' (neutral technical rule), debates over housing, pensions and taxation will be less performative and more tractable — changing framing, bargaining and reform feasibility.