Politicized blame for security deployments

After high‑profile attacks, public commentary often shifts quickly to faulting the officials who ordered visible security deployments rather than focusing on perpetrators or operational facts. That pattern polarizes attention, can deter frank assessment of motives (e.g., terrorism vs. individual pathology), and influences future decisions about using military forces for domestic security. — If political actors routinely turn violence into an occasion for partisan blame over deployment choices, it will distort accountability, erode trust in public‑safety decisions, and shape immigration and counter‑terrorism politics.