A new preprint that augments the DICE climate-economy model (adding endogenous innovation, age structure, and land‑use emissions) finds that keeping global fertility at replacement yields a much larger population by 2200 but almost no change in long‑run temperature paths. The larger population boosts innovation and quickly overcomes a short, relative dip in per‑capita GDP from higher near‑term emissions. This undercuts climate‑based antinatalism and reframes fertility as compatible with decarbonization.
— It challenges the premise that fewer births are a meaningful lever on climate, shifting debate toward innovation and decoupling rather than population restraint.
Davide Piffer
2025.08.22
70% relevant
The dialogue challenges climate antinatalism by implying births aren’t the right lever—suggesting selection effects on traits matter more than headcount for long‑run outcomes, aligning with the claim that fertility isn’t a meaningful climate lever.
Cremieux
2025.07.12
100% relevant
Budolfson et al. (2025) preprint expanding the DICE model shows minimal temperature differences between UN 'Depopulation' and replacement‑rate 'Stabilization' despite a 90% larger global population by 2200.
← Back to All Ideas