Two prominent, ideologically opposed columnists — M. Gessen at the New York Times and Marc Thiessen at the Washington Post — are described as advancing very similar hawkish foreign‑policy arguments. The article treats this as evidence of a broader, cross‑cutting elite media consensus that privileges military responses regardless of partisan identity.
— If elite outlets converge on hawkish framing, bipartisan support for military options may become harder to challenge and could narrow democratic debate on war and peace.
Nikos Mohammadi
2026.05.06
100% relevant
On‑page examples: M. Gessen’s Pulitzer‑lauded essays and Marc Thiessen’s columns both argued hawkish positions; the author uses their profiles and recent pieces as direct exemplars.
← Back to All Ideas