Prize Law as Judicial Nation‑Building

Early federal admiralty and prize litigation (e.g., the Henfield case and the 1796–97 privateering docket) were not mere technical disputes but operational tools through which the judiciary established federal authority, enforced neutrality, and materially shaped American sovereignty at sea. Understanding these cases shows courts can build state capacity in narrowly technical domains that later become constitutional pillars. — This reframes debates about judicial power: courts sometimes 'build the nation' by resolving specialized, high‑stakes rule disputes—an argument with implications for modern questions about courts, executive war powers, and how legal doctrines harden into sovereignty.