When commentators and institutions emphasize the provocative conduct of protesters as the defining context for violent police responses, it incrementally shifts legal and political norms toward accepting deadly force as a routine tool of crowd control. Over time this reframing can lower inquiry rigor (forensics, de‑escalation review) and expand operational discretion.
— If adopted widely, this narrative changes how use‑of‑force incidents are adjudicated, reduces independent oversight, and affects protest strategy and public policy on civil liberties and policing.
eugyppius
2026.01.12
100% relevant
The article argues Jonathan Ross was 'legally justified' because protests by people like Renée Good were 'dangerous and provocative' — an explicit instance of using protest framing to justify lethal force.
← Back to All Ideas