When large street demonstrations lack clear, implementable demands they often function as attention‑machines (spectacle) rather than instruments of change; that dynamic makes them vulnerable to capture by media cycles, partisan actors, and institutional inertia and reduces the chance of durable policy outcomes.
— If protest energy routinely prioritizes spectacle over concrete reform, civic actors and policymakers must redesign routes from street pressure to institutional change or risk recurring cycles of escalation without results.
David Dennison
2026.01.16
100% relevant
Dennison’s observation that Minnesota ICE protests demand 'ICE out' but offer no feasible legal or policy alternative exemplifies a protest that emphasizes removal and spectacle over legislative or regulatory objectives.
← Back to All Ideas