Quorum Illusion in Expert Votes

Updated: 2025.09.03 1M ago 1 sources
Media often cite supermajority percentages from professional associations without disclosing turnout, creating a false sense of sweeping consensus. In the IAGS case, '86% support' masked that only 28% of members voted—roughly 43 yes votes, not 430. This denominator omission converts niche resolutions into headline 'expert verdicts' on live legal questions. — If 'consensus' can be manufactured via low-turnout ballots, policymakers and the public may be misled about authoritative positions on war, health, or science.

Sources

Finding truth in the white smoke of consensus
David Josef Volodzko 2025.09.03 100% relevant
Reuters’ report that 86% of IAGS voters backed a genocide resolution while only 28% of the 500 members voted, implying ~43 approvals.
← Back to All Ideas