When pollsters constantly adjust weighting, sample frames, and likely‑voter rules, the distribution and correlation of polling errors change too, so past error patterns become poor guides for forecasting future errors. That makes it hard for models and commentators to calibrate election probabilities, and it increases the value of explicitly modeling correlated errors rather than treating races as independent.
— If polling methodology is a moving target, media narratives and models that ignore correlated, methodology‑driven errors will misstate uncertainty and mislead voters and policymakers.
Nate Silver
2026.10.20
100% relevant
Nate Silver’s critique that pollsters keep 'tinkering with the recipe' and his contrast between a coin‑flip independent‑race model (91% for Democrats) and FLIPR’s correlated‑error mid‑70s odds exemplify the problem.
← Back to all ideas