State laws (for example Ohio’s SB1) convert anti‑DEI politics into durable administrative tools: vague prohibitions, auditing powers, reporting regimes, and conditional funding that let politicians police curriculum and personnel. The result is not just policy reversal but a new governance layer that replaces faculty and accreditor judgment with politically controlled compliance mechanisms.
— If replicated, this model shifts control of higher education from academic institutions to partisan state apparatuses, reshaping teaching, hiring, and the civic formation of students nationwide.
Richard A. Greenwald
2026.04.13
100% relevant
Ohio’s Advance Ohio Higher Education Act (SB1), signed by Gov. Mike DeWine and effective June 2025, is cited as a concrete example: it bans DEI offices, restricts statements on 'controversial belief or policy', creates reporting/audit rules, and conditions funding.
← Back to All Ideas