Education reforms repeatedly fail because political and media incentives reward visible policy promises and symbolic changes more than the slow, boring work of implementation, measurement, and local management. As a result, capacity deficits and perverse incentives in districts and state agencies consistently blunt reform results.
— Spotting the signaling/implementation tradeoff reframes why well‑funded reforms underperform and directs attention toward institutional capacity and accountability as the place to invest political capital.
Robert VerBruggen
2026.10.19
100% relevant
City Journal piece by Robert VerBruggen asks why reforms almost always fail—this question implies the signaling vs implementation tension as a central causal hypothesis.
← Back to all ideas