When zero-sum policies like rent control shift dollars from landlords to tenants, advocates frame them as universal moral goods rather than interest-driven transfers. This 'competitive morality' lens clarifies why redistributive fights are waged through moral rhetoric instead of frank self-interest.
— Exposes how coalitions launder material interests through moral language across housing, labor, and identity policy, improving transparency about who benefits and why in governance debates.
Rob Kurzban
2025.08.20
100% relevant
The article contrasts 'universal' rules with 'competitive' rules and uses rent control as a clear example of a zero-sum legal rule defended via moral reasoning.
← Back to All Ideas