Federal grants for court‑ordered or coercive behavioral programs should require either (a) inclusion of established programs with existing administrative outcomes or (b) mandatory fidelity checks and linkage to objective administrative data (arrests, hospitalizations, homelessness) as a condition of funding and of reporting to Congress.
— Requiring program‑fidelity and administrative‑data linkage prevents bureaucratic 'box‑checking' evaluations that can mislead policy, ensuring that claims about interventions like AOT rest on comparable, objective outcomes rather than self‑reports.
2025.07.30
100% relevant
GAO found HHS evaluations inconclusive because grants went only to new or voluntary programs and relied on self‑reported surveys rather than administrative outcomes; New York’s Kendra’s Law administrative studies show large objective effects.
← Back to All Ideas