Rhythmic Open‑Source Recommendations

A major social platform announces a cadenceed policy to publish the full recommendation stack (ranking code, developer notes, and change logs) on a repeating schedule (e.g., weekly or monthly). Regular, machine‑readable releases change what 'transparency' means: they create an expectation of continuous public auditability, but also produce new risks (security, gaming, export controls, IP capture) and new governance levers for regulators, researchers and rivals. — If adopted by X or copied by other platforms, periodic open‑sourcing of recommendation systems would rewrite the rules of platform accountability, antitrust/competition debates, and how civil‑society/technical researchers can audit and influence algorithmic public goods.