Many political actors who rhetorically reject socialism nonetheless support or deploy centralized control when it involves overthrowing and then managing foreign states. This creates a recurring contradiction: anti‑socialist ideology at home paired with willingness to centrally plan or 'run' other countries, producing both moral and practical governance failures.
— The paradox reframes intervention debates: critics should weigh not only legality and morality but the ideological inconsistency and the practical knowledge/sovereignty problems that follow from trying to 'run' other states.
Jerusalem Demsas
2026.01.05
100% relevant
Trump’s Jan. 3 operation and his statement—'we’re going to be running [Venezuela]' with Rubio and Hegseth—illustrates the phenomenon: anti‑socialist rhetoric plus announced plans for centralized governance of a foreign nation.
← Back to All Ideas