Rigor Over Forced Integration

When districts are highly segregated by demographics, prioritizing forced 'integration' policies can divert scarce instructional and safety resources away from raising academic rigor for the most disadvantaged students. Policymakers should evaluate integration proposals against a simple test: will they increase measurable learning outcomes for low‑performing cohorts, or will they reallocate teachers, programs, and discipline capacity in ways that worsen those outcomes? — This reframes the school‑integration debate from an abstract equity frame into an evidence‑driven trade‑off about where limited education resources best raise life chances for the least advantaged.