When culturally shared practices rely on a small set of dominant national institutions, disagreement over basic governance (rules, adjudication, enforcement) can prevent those practices from globalizing. Nationalistic rule disputes, mid‑event rule changes and retaliatory bans can collapse tournament circuits, shrink commercial appeal, and accelerate generational abandonment.
— Disputes over standards and governance in cultural fields (games, sports, rituals, festivals) are a pragmatic mechanism by which states and institutions exert soft power or block cultural diffusion, with downstream effects on diplomacy, cultural industries, and youth engagement.
msmash
2026.01.15
100% relevant
Ke Jie’s 2025 withdrawal after repeated penalties, China’s ban on foreign players, IMSA adopting American Go rules due to East Asian deadlock, and Nihon Ki‑in exploring sale of its HQ.
← Back to All Ideas