Safety‑Only Drug Approval

Updated: 2025.09.10 1M ago 1 sources
The authors argue the FDA should require proof of safety but not efficacy, returning to the pre‑1962 standard. They contend this would cut a decade off timelines, slash costs, spur competition, and expand treatments for rare diseases without compromising safety. — This challenges the core U.S. drug‑approval doctrine and reframes high drug prices as a regulatory design problem rather than a pricing failure.

Sources

Deregulating Drug Development
David R. Henderson, Charles L. Hooper & Solomon S. Steiner 2025.09.10 100% relevant
The article cites post‑1962 efficacy rules, 12–14‑year timelines, and an estimated $9 billion average per drug as evidence that efficacy trials are the main cost/time driver.
← Back to All Ideas