When institutions tightly guard information about large technical or military projects, local populations often generate vivid, self‑sustaining narratives to fill the information void. Those rumors may be wildly inaccurate but perform political and social functions—explaining danger, policing outsiders, and shaping attitudes toward the project.
— Recognizing secrecy→rumor dynamics matters for contemporary policy around classified labs, AI research centers, border facilities, and emergency responses because misinformed local narratives can erode trust and complicate governance.
Jack T. Rametta
2025.12.03
85% relevant
The article interrogates whether returning to closed committee negotiations would restore legislative deal‑making while acknowledging that secrecy also invites leaks and selective amplification — precisely the dynamic the existing idea flags: secrecy creates information vacuums that generate rumor, selective replay, and political backlash (the author cites C‑SPAN, post‑1970 reforms, and leak risks).
Robin Hanson
2025.11.29
92% relevant
Hanson argues that decades of official ridicule and concealment around UFO reports make rumor cascades and conspiratorial narratives inevitable; this is a direct instantiation of the preexisting idea that secrecy about technical projects produces vigorous public speculation and mistrust.
Isegoria
2025.11.29
100% relevant
Groves’ anecdote about Santa Fe residents inventing stories of ferocious African dogs, lethal guards, and submarine projects around Los Alamos exemplifies how a secretive site spawned elaborate local rumors.
← Back to All Ideas