Secrecy‑for‑Compromise Tradeoff

Updated: 2025.12.03 3D ago 1 sources
Restoring confidential committee bargaining can increase the probability of bipartisan, durable compromises by reducing audience‑driven incentives that punish dealmaking. But the modern media ecosystem and disclosure risks (leaks, clips, replay) create asymmetric costs: secrecy may enable deals yet also magnify selective outrage when confidentiality is broken. — Resolving this trade‑off matters for democratic legitimacy and legislative effectiveness because choices about procedural secrecy determine whether Congress can solve long‑term problems or only perform for the camera.

Sources

Would Secrecy Make Congress Do Its Job?
Jack T. Rametta 2025.12.03 100% relevant
The article cites the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970, C‑SPAN’s spread to committee hearings, and contemporary concerns that leaks and social‑media replay make public negotiation politically costly.
← Back to All Ideas