Selection Drains Online Movements

Updated: 2025.09.07 1M ago 2 sources
Early adopters in online ideological scenes are idea‑driven and funny; once visibility and monetization arrive, status‑seekers pour in while high‑quality contributors and mainstream‑adjacent artists exit to avoid stigma. The result is more infighting and a shift toward low‑effort 'slop' content, independent of the movement’s formal ideas. — This shifts diagnoses of movement rise-and-fall from ideology or leadership to predictable incentive-driven selection effects that can apply across political factions.

Sources

Some Links, 9/7/2025
Arnold Kling 2025.09.07 68% relevant
Citing Robertson et al. and Nathan Witkin, Kling emphasizes perverse attention incentives where a small toxic minority generates a third of content, driving more extreme, negative posts—precisely the selection dynamic that degrades movements’ discourse as notoriety and monetization rise.
What happened to the dissident right"?
Sebastian Jensen 2025.09.05 100% relevant
The author claims pre‑2021 dissident right members were 'in it for the ideas and humour,' while post‑2021 entrants chased status and Twitter monetization, and talented people left to protect reputation and income.
← Back to All Ideas