Even with stricter border controls and political hostility to mass migration, the United States continues to attract highly educated foreign talent — driven by wages, sector demand, and global mobility — while lower‑skilled arrivals decline or become more contested. This bifurcation means policy debates should separate selective, economy‑driving skilled flows from mass low‑skill migration with different fiscal and social profiles.
— Distinguishing resilient skilled migration from contested mass migration reframes policy choices: governments can pursue tighter borders without forfeiting the high‑value talent that underpins the tech and STEM economy.
2026.03.04
80% relevant
The newsletter cites a study showing interest among skilled workers in moving to the U.S. rose from 16% (2021) to 22% (2025), illustrating continued demand for skilled migration despite visa friction — a datapoint that maps onto the existing pattern that skilled flows remain robust even as policy and politics constrain mobility.
Joel Kotkin
2026.03.03
100% relevant
Airswift relocation survey (16% to 22% interest 2021–25), claims of continued STEM inflows from India, China, Europe, and CBO notes about the fiscal effects of recent low‑skill surges.
← Back to All Ideas